The Washington Post article explicitly lists the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and then 6th place candidates, conspicuously skipping over Ron Paul at 5th place. They even go on to discuss the 7th, 8th and 10th place candidates.
No mention of Ron Paul whatsoever in the entire 1,361 word article.
They discuss Giuliani and McCain, both of whom Ron Paul beat in the poll and they even discuss Fred Thompson, who is not even a Presidential Candidate.
The only people not discussed besides Ron Paul were the 9th and last place (11th) candidates, Duncan Hunter and John Cox.
It's odd that the candidate that finished in the top five, and had the unanimous recognition elsewhere of having easily the most visible, enthusiastic, and large crowd of supporters, only rivaled in size by Romney's group but not in enthusiasm, would not be mentioned. That the candidate widely called a long shot would garner almost 10% of the votes and place in the top 5, ahead of both McCain and Giuliani who are considered big name front-runners.
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee finished second with 18 percent of the 14,302 votes cast, and Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas ran third with 15 percent. Huckabee and Brownback had waged a fierce battle for the allegiance of Iowa's social and religious conservatives. An ebullient Huckabee said Saturday night that the outcome will give his campaign a significant boost and vowed to coalesce those conservatives in Iowa and other early-voting states.Fox News also conspicuously fails to mention Ron Paul at all in
Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, the most outspoken opponent of current U.S. immigration policy, finished fourth with 14 percent. Former Wisconsin governor Tommy G. Thompson was sixth at 7 percent. He had said he would quit the presidential race if he failed to finish in the top two, and his campaign said late Saturday that he would make an announcement within 48 hours about his candidacy.
their article, along with MSNBC following suit in their article. CNN lists the poll results in a sidebar, but makes no mention of Dr. Paul in their article either.
On the other hand, the LA Times mentions Dr. Paul a few times in its article on the Straw Poll, and Reuters also included Dr. Paul in their coverage. The New York Times has an excellent article with a few paragraphs about Ron Paul's great genuine support where supporters came from all over the country of their own volition, unlike the Romney and Brownback supporters who were bussed in and had their tickets paid for.
Iowa Straw Poll Results for the 2008 Republican Presidential Candidates Candidate Number of votes Percentage of total votes Mitt Romney 4,516 Votes 31.6% Mike Huckabee 2,587 Votes 18.1% Sam Brownback 2,192 Votes 15.3% Tom Tancredo 1,961 Votes 13.7% Ron Paul 1,305 Votes 9.1% Tommy Thompson 1,039 Votes 7.3% Fred Thompson 203 Votes 1.4% Rudy Giuliani 183 Votes 1.3% Duncan Hunter 174 Votes 1.2% John McCain 101 Votes .7% John Cox 41 Votes .3% 14,302 Total Ballots Cast
Could it be that the reason Ron Paul is not getting any "run" is because he's not going to win. Waste your vote on him all you want. One loser voting for another.
Post a Comment